This is NOT the End – link 

Great little post on Agile Otter: This is Not the End.


Affiliated Promotions:

Try our automated online Scrum coach: Scrum Insight - free scores and basic advice, upgrade to get in-depth insight for your team. It takes between 8 and 11 minutes for each team member to fill in the survey, and your results are available immediately. Try it in your next retrospective.

Please share!
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Another Agile Article on Slashdot – Andy Hunt has Failed, not Agile

For reference, here is the link to the article on Slashdot called Is Agile Development a Failing Concept?

This article will generate lots of great discussion, but most of it will be ignorant.  My biggest problem with this is that one of the authors of the Agile Manifesto, Andy Hunt, has asserted that Agile just isn’t working out.  My opinion: Andy has failed to have the necessary patience for a decades-long cultural change.  This is a lot like a leader at Toyota saying that lean has failed because 50 years after they started doing it, not everyone is doing it properly yet.  One organization that I know of has been working on changing to Agile for over 10 years and they still aren’t “done”.  That’s actually okay.


Affiliated Promotions:

Try our automated online Scrum coach: Scrum Insight - free scores and basic advice, upgrade to get in-depth insight for your team. It takes between 8 and 11 minutes for each team member to fill in the survey, and your results are available immediately. Try it in your next retrospective.

Please share!
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

All Team Quality Standards Should Be Part of the Definition of “Done”

The other day a technology leader was asking questions as if he didn’t agree that things like pair programming and code review should be part of the Definition of “Done” because they are activities that don’t show up in a tangible way in the end product. But if these things are part of your quality standards, they should be included in the definition of “Done” because they inform the “right way” of getting things done. In other words, the Definition of “Done” is not merely a description of the “Done” state but also the way(s) of getting to “Done” – the “how” in terms of quality standards. In fact, if you look at most of any team’s definition of “Done”, a lot of it is QA activity, carried out either as a practice or as an operation that is automated. Every agile engineering practice is essentially a quality standard and as they become part of a team’s practice, should be included as part of the definition of “Done”. The leader’s question was “if we’re done and we didn’t do pair programming and pair programming is part of our definition of “Done”, then does that mean we’re not done?” Which is sort of a backwards question because if you are saying you’re done and you haven’t done pair programming, then by definition pair programming isn’t part of your definition of done. But there are teams out there who would never imagine themselves to be done without pair programming because pair programming is a standard that they see as being essential to delivering quality product.

Everything that a Scrum Development Team does to ensure quality should be part of their definition of “Done”. The definition of “Done” isn’t just a description of the final “Done” state of an increment of product. In fact, If that were true, then we should be asking why anything is part of the definition of “Done”. This is the whole problem that this artifact solves. If this were the case, the team could just say that they are done whenever they say they are done and never actually identify better ways of getting to done and establishing better standards. We could just say (and we did and still do), “there’s the software, it’s done,” the software itself being its own definition of “Done”.

On the contrary the definition of “Done” is what it means for something to be done properly. In other words, it is the artifact that captures the “better ways of developing software” that the team has uncovered and established as practice because their practices reflect their belief that “Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design enhances agility” (Manifesto for Agile Software Development). The definition of “Done” is essentially about integrity—what is done every Sprint in order to be Agile and get things done better. When we say that testing is part of our definition of “Done”, that is our way of saying that as a team we have a shared understanding that it is better to test something before we say that it is done than to say that it’s done without testing it because without testing it we are not confident that it is done to our standards of quality. Otherwise, we would be content in just writing a bunch of code, seeing that it “works” on a workstation or in the development environment and pushing it into production as a “Done” feature with a high chance that there are a bunch of bugs or that it may even break the build.

This is similar to saying a building is “Done” without an inspection (activity/practice) that it meets certain safety standards or for a surgeon to say that he or she has done a good enough job of performing a surgical operation without monitoring the vital signs of the patient (partly automated, partly a human activity). Of course, this is false. The same logic holds true when we add other activities (automated or otherwise) that reflect more stringent quality standards around our products. The definition of “Done”,therefore, is partly made up of a set of activities that make up the standard quality practices of a team.

Professions have standards. For example, it is a standard practice for a surgeon to wash his or her hands between performing surgical operations. At one time it wasn’t. Much like TDD or pair programming, it was discovered as a better way to get a job done. In this day and age, we would not say that a surgeon had done a good job if he or she failed to carry out this standard practice. It would be considered preposterous for someone to say that they don’t care whether or not surgeons wash their hands between operations as long as the results are good. If a dying patient said to a surgeon, “don’t waste time washing your hands just cut me open and get right to it,” of course this would be dismissed as an untenable request. Regardless of whether or not the results of the surgery were satisfactory to the patient, we would consider it preposterous that a surgeon would not wash his or her hands because we know that this is statistically extremely risky, even criminal behaviour. We just know better. Hand washing was discovered, recognized as a better way of working, formalized as a standard and is now understood by even the least knowledgable members of society as an obvious part of the definition of “Done” of surgery. Similarly, there are some teams that would not push anything to production without TDD and automated tests. This is a quality standard and is therefore part of their definition of “Done”, because they understand that manual testing alone is extremely risky. And then there are some teams with standards that would make it unthinkable for them to push a feature that has not been developed with pair programming. For these teams, pair programming is a quality standard practice and therefore part of their definition of “Done”.

“As Scrum Teams mature,” reads the Scrum Guide, “it is expected that their definitions of “Done” will expand to include more stringent criteria for higher quality.” What else is pair programming, or any other agile engineering practice, if it is not a part of a team’s criteria for higher quality? Is pair programming not a more stringent criteria than, say, traditional code review? Therefore, any standard, be it a practice or an automated operation, that exists as part of the criteria for higher quality should be included as part of the definition of “Done”. If it’s not part of what it means for an increment of product to be “Done”—that is “done right”—then why are you doing it?


Affiliated Promotions:

Try our automated online Scrum coach: Scrum Insight - free scores and basic advice, upgrade to get in-depth insight for your team. It takes between 8 and 11 minutes for each team member to fill in the survey, and your results are available immediately. Try it in your next retrospective.

Please share!
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Berteig
Upcoming Courses
View Full Course Schedule
Stop the BS Metrics! Performance Reviews in Agile Teams - Lunch Session
Online
C$0.00
Mar 2
2021
Details
Seven Design Thinking Tips for Product Owners - Lunch Session
Online
C$0.00
Mar 3
2021
Details
Advanced Certified Scrum Product Owner® (A-CSPO) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1695.00
Mar 9
2021
Details
Leave Us Alone! - Dealing with Urgent Interruptions in Agile Teams
Online - Instructor Led
C$149.00
Mar 9
2021
Details
Team Kanban Practitioner® (TKP) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1195.00
Mar 10
2021
Details
Banking on Kanban - Kanban in the Financial Sector
Online - Instructor Led
C$149.00
Mar 10
2021
Details
Improve Estimation Effectiveness for Agile Work - Practicing Agile Estimation Techniques (ML-PAET)
Online
C$149.00
Mar 10
2021
Details
The Myth of Self-Organizing Teams - Lunch Session
Online
C$0.00
Mar 11
2021
Details
Dealing with Slackers, Idiots and Subversives in Agile Teams - Lunch Session
Online
C$0.00
Mar 16
2021
Details
Deadlines Are Dead To Me - Dealing with Deadlines in Agile Teams
Online - Instructor Led
C$149.00
Mar 18
2021
Details
Certified ScrumMaster® (CSM) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1595.00
Mar 22
2021
Details
Scrum Foundations - Build A Strong Foundation On Scrum
Online - Instructor Led
C$149.00
Mar 22
2021
Details
Certified Scrum Product Owner® (CSPO) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1795.00
Mar 25
2021
Details
What the Heck is Kanban? - Introduction to the Kanban Method
Online - Instructor Led
C$149.00
Mar 25
2021
Details
Kanban System Design® (KSD) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1525.75
Mar 30
2021
Details
Advanced Certified ScrumMaster® (A-CSM) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1440.75
Mar 30
2021
Details
Leadership Writing Workshop [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$495.00
Mar 30
2021
Details
Kanban Your Projects - Kanban for Project Managers
Online - Instructor Led
C$149.00
Mar 31
2021
Details
Certified ScrumMaster® (CSM) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1355.75
Apr 6
2021
Details
Banking on Kanban - Kanban in the Financial Sector
Online - Instructor Led
C$149.00
Apr 6
2021
Details
Four Strategic Tips on using Technology & Digital Media Effectively - Lunchtime
Online
C$0.00
Apr 6
2021
Details
How to Effectively Achieve Work/Life Balance in your Environment - Lunchtime
Online
C$0.00
Apr 7
2021
Details
Leadership Writing Workshop [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$495.00
Apr 7
2021
Details
Leadership for Managers
Online
C$149.00
Apr 7
2021
Details
Team Kanban Practitioner® (TKP) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1015.75
Apr 8
2021
Details
Should we just Ban Facebook (and other Social Media) in the Workplace? - Lunchtime
Online
C$0.00
Apr 8
2021
Details
Boost Efficiency and Flow on Your Scrum Team - Kanban for Scrum Masters
Online - Instructor Led
C$149.00
Apr 8
2021
Details
Critical Steps on how to be an Effective Colleague/Manager in the Digital Age - Lunchtime
Online
C$0.00
Apr 9
2021
Details
Certified Scrum Product Owner® (CSPO) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1525.75
Apr 13
2021
Details
Leadership Writing Workshop [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$495.00
Apr 13
2021
Details
Certified ScrumMaster® (CSM) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1355.75
Apr 21
2021
Details
Leadership Writing Workshop [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$495.00
Apr 21
2021
Details
Advanced Certified Scrum Product Owner® (A-CSPO) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1440.75
Apr 27
2021
Details
Advanced Certified ScrumMaster® (A-CSM) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1440.75
Apr 29
2021
Details
Certified ScrumMaster® (CSM) [Virtual Training]
Online
C$1355.75
May 3
2021
Details
Certified Scrum Product Owner® (CSPO) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1525.75
May 6
2021
Details
Team Kanban Practitioner® (TKP) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1015.75
May 12
2021
Details
Certified ScrumMaster® (CSM) [Virtual Training]
Online
C$1355.75
May 18
2021
Details
Kanban System Design® (KSD) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1525.75
May 18
2021
Details
Certified Scrum Product Owner® (CSPO) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1525.75
May 25
2021
Details
Advanced Certified ScrumMaster® (A-CSM) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1440.75
May 27
2021
Details
Kanban Systems Improvement® (KSI) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1525.75
Jun 1
2021
Details
Certified ScrumMaster® (CSM) [Virtual Training]
Online
C$1595.00
Jun 1
2021
Details
Advanced Certified Scrum Product Owner® (A-CSPO) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1695.00
Jun 4
2021
Details
Team Kanban Practitioner® (TKP) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1195.00
Jun 8
2021
Details
Certified ScrumMaster® (CSM) [Virtual Training]
Online
C$1595.00
Jun 14
2021
Details
Certified Scrum Product Owner® (CSPO) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1795.00
Jun 17
2021
Details
Advanced Certified ScrumMaster® (A-CSM) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1695.00
Jun 22
2021
Details
Certified ScrumMaster® (CSM) [Virtual Training]
Online
C$1595.00
Jun 28
2021
Details
Kanban System Design® (KSD) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1795.00
Jul 6
2021
Details
Kanban System Design® (KSD) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1795.00
Aug 25
2021
Details
Kanban Systems Improvement® (KSI) [Virtual Learning]
Online
C$1795.00
Sep 15
2021
Details